Showing posts with label Carrying My Cross. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carrying My Cross. Show all posts

Saturday, June 16, 2012

10. Battle of the Banks 2006-2007

If you're pulled within to take the high road, to do the right thing, don't fight it. 


I lost my legal fight but won abjection, the seed of humility. 


In retrospect, the arguments, good or bad, demonstrate how God works through humankind; often through those that are the most incapable and irreligious.


There were others fighting this too, many indignant cries of "I told you so" in 2008.


The faithful, people of goodwill have been assured of a place where justice is recognized and celebrated, our hope lies there.


Battle of the Banks 2006-2007

Monday, May 28, 2012

9. Iowa

(Original Blog Text Posted in 2007 by Gary E. Geraci, hyperlinks added this posting - Actual names and addresses redacted by author, May 2012.  Where indicated, all dates and case numbers are authentic and can be retrieved under Federal Open Records law.)

Music courses through my body, blood, and soul.  Music is the salve, the spirit which animates my mind, body, and soul.  Greater than any other singular force, refreshing, sustaining, pushing, and motivating, I have elicited a lifetime of benefits from all that is musical.  I am in deep gratitude for such divine gift.   Inspiration drawn from music has sustained my spirit during the deepest, darkest hours especially when staring down seemingly insurmountable adversity.

During my approximate year long legal battle against Mortgage Bank WF, I can define a particular genre of music that dominated my world: hard rock. 

One band in particular, Slipknot, produced a double live album called “9.0. Live.”   This work single handedly accompanied and sustained my soul during the countless hours consumed researching law and writing legal documents and briefs.  The spectacle of the live show this album memorialized, a stage full of musicians and performers, identities concealed in horrid, goulish, zombie like dress, simply blew me away.  I found the front man’s attitude and explicit commentary between songs regarding his stand against corporate record labels to be immensely satisfying, especially when introducing the album’s platinum status to his cheering audience.  I played this album over and over again, day after day, and at high volume levels. 

Normally a “riff” rather than a “lyric” man, the line “I fight for the ones who can’t fight” in the song “Pulse of the Maggots” resonated with particular clarity and meaning during this period.  Further, I could relate the sheer, unrelenting pain in the singer’s repeated scream “SHE ISN’T REAL, I CAN’T MAKE HER REAL” in the song “Vermillion” to indignation borne by a judicial system not capable of administering justice for all.  

Ironically, Mortgage Bank WF, N.A., the division strategically placed in the front and center of the battle by Mortgage Bank WF legal counsel, is headquartered in none-other than Des Moines, Iowa, the same location the band Slipknot calls home!

I declare my gratitude to the people of Des Moines, Iowa, to the band Slipknot, and to the city’s burgeoning creative class!  

Saturday, May 5, 2012

8. Taking A Stand

 (Original Blog Text, "FBI Tips and Public Leads," Posted in 2008 by Gary E. Geraci, hyperlinks added this posting - Actual names and addresses redacted by author, May 2012.  Where indicated, all dates and case numbers are authentic and can be retrieved under Federal Open Records law.)



The following is the word-for-word transcription of an admission I made to the FBI on or around 6/15/2006 via the site https://tips.fbi.gov/.  No one from the FBI ever followed up.

"Please have a member of Supervising Special Residential Agent, Mr. P. N. staff call Mr. Gary Geraci regarding the PMC 2006 conference Mr. N. recently attended.

Several members in attendance should be of particular interests to your continuing investigation against rising mortgage fraud.  We hope this is why you had an agent at the recent conference.

While trumpeting the accolades of the newest mortgage industry software: expediting turn time origination to close, ridding the process of human biases, the inherent ability to prevent fraud, etc., these very developers and alliance partners your agent encountered at the conference, have developed a private, password protected network where they run an operation called a “Collateral Management System,” or CMS.

Based on alliance partners’ own admissions, the operation, through its alliance partnership agreements, should now consist of a controlling market share of the country’s entire mortgage sector.  Go to your Internet research and follow the company “XXX” and “XXX XXX” to start.  Mr. R’s XXX is the organization behind the CMS and the new, fast, broadband width “Smart Pipes.”  Realize this alliance encompasses not only a controlling share of the country’s collateral valuation consumers such as the national lenders, but also a commanding share of the varying service providers all vying to stay in good grace with such powerful aggregation of “mortgage service” consumers.  These service providers are professions such as appraisers, inspectors, title companies, credit agencies, etc.

My own investigation, focusing solely on the appraisal side of collateral valuation, is now in proceedings before the Secretary of Treasury, Case NO: 2006-SOX-000091.  The Sarbanes-Oxley forum is appropriate because of the tie-in the appraiser has to the collateral valuation process for Mortgage Backed Security instruments our country trades globally.  The pleadings presented reveal substantive evidence laying the framework for an oligopsony like alliance, its synergies, and its creation of boutique, software applications, particularly in the area of Loan Origination Systems or LOS applications.  The evidence collected, in appearance alone, circumstantially suggests an illegal avenue for appraiser blacklisting.  Furthermore, and most troubling to me, are appraiser selection capabilities based on irregular, “performance comparison” reports a loan officer can do in her LOS to isolate and reward top performing appraisers based on individual dollar contributions to the lender’s overall, closed loan dollar volumes.  These capabilities are in clear violation of banking laws such as promulgated under FIRREA.  The alliance becomes illegal and anticompetitive when it leverages such size and weight to design products and private, password protected communication networks to collectively wrestle away control of the service provider section charged with the “unbiased” analysis of collateral quality.  The economic harm against our nation has historically been severe under such “control frauds.”

It is clever that such alliance would try to keep “its enemy close” in inviting members of your office and the Comptroller of Currency’s office to such an event.  However, I hope I have piqued enough interest with my tip and pledge full cooperation should a forthcoming investigation be warranted."

Respectfully,
Gary Geraci
Appraiser and Graduate Engineer

Sunday, April 29, 2012

7. Blowing Bubbles


(Original Text, "Mmm, mmm, mmmh. Go Figure" Posted in 2007 by Gary E. Geraci)

Mmm, mmm, mmmh. Go figure.  What’s that you say Mr. and Mrs. Homeowner?  Your bank is ready to foreclose on your home? 


You mean that home I appraised about a year ago for $100,000, the value that at the time your loan officer said was “too low?”  Didn’t you and your loan officer get after me and say that I was “killing the deal?”  Didn’t your loan officer then “save the deal” by calling in another appraiser who appraised the home at $120,000, the exact amount needed to get a new loan?  And you guys now owe $120,000 on a home that every buyer, investor, appraiser, and real estate agent alike knows will only sell for $100,000.  Oh, I’m so sorry that you lost your job Mr. Homeowner.  I understand that you are now forced to sell your home.  You’re kidding me?  No offers yet on your $120,000 sales price?  And you must ask for $120,000 because you owe $120,000?  I see.  


Mmm, mmm, mmmmh. Go figure.

What’s that Mr. Banker?  I agree, that incompetent appraiser! Who convinced him to appraise such property at $120,000 in the first place?  Yeah, I know. What’s that? You’re not going to lose a minimum $20,000 on that $120,000 loan that you made last year? But you’re taking the house back aren’t you?  The homeowners can’t make the house payment and the market is only going to pay $100,000 because every house in the area identical to the one you are taking back is selling for, at the most, $100,000, correct?    What’s that?  You already sold off the loan interests in Mr. Homeowner’s property in a Residential Mortgage Backed Security offering (RMBS)?  


So a Wall Street investor bought the $120,000 note convinced that should the note go bad, the collateral, the home itself, could be sold for $120,000?  So you have passed the risks out of your bank and into the hands of American investors?  Brilliant!  (No wonder your loan officers commit bank fraud so regularly!) The bank’s own investors don’t have to deal with such risks and even if you were found responsible for the bad loan your legal department could simply go after the appraiser and sue him for inflating the appraised value thereby creating all the losses.  After all, your bank did hire an independent, third party appraiser to appraise that property correct?  Nice to absolve yourself of any wrongdoing right?   What’s that?  Seeing a lot of foreclosures as of late? I see.  


Mmm, mmm, mmmh.  Go figure. 




Saturday, April 28, 2012

6. You Must Have Been High


 (Original Blog Text Posted in 2007 by Gary E. Geraci, hyperlinks added this posting - Actual names and addresses redacted by author, April 2012.  Where indicated, all dates and case numbers are authentic and can be retrieved under Federal Open Records law.)


“You must have been high.  You must have been sooooo high.” -The Pot/Tool-

E-mail receipt of a formal complaint written December 15, 2005 to the Federal Trade Commission.  Complaint submitted via the Appraisal Institute’s “Appraisal Independence Action Center” complaint portal.

Gary Geraci
From: Appraisal Institute [xxxxx@appraisalinstitute.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Appraisal Institute
Subject: Appraisal Independence Action Center -- FTC

December 15, 2005

[recipient address was inserted here]

Dear [recipient name was inserted here],

I am a real estate appraiser and I wish to submit a complaint against a non-bank mortgage lender.

The complaint is against:

XXXtrust Mortgage
8330 Any Blvd. STE 130
Anytown, VA 22182-2624

And

Ms. K. N.
XXX Trust Mortgage, Inc
8105 Any Court
Anywhere, VA 22102
Phone: 703-xxx-xxxx
Fax: 703-xxx-xxx

And

BIG Corporation (AMC) South
1063 Any Park Drive
Any Other, VA 23059-4500
Phone: xxx-xxx-xxx
FAX xxx-xxx-xxxx

RE: xxxx Ranch Road 620, Unit xxx, Austin, TX 78734

Complaint: Appraisal Supplantation without Cause

Brief Summary:

Complex property assignment involving highly publicized construction defects, lawsuit, mass eviction, and major re-construction received from BIG, an Appraisal Management Company (AMC). Negotiated a higher fee to provide just compensation for the added complexities.  Clearly communicated due diligence requirements that would need to be performed. 

Approval received from both BIG and XXXtrust Mortgage.

Request engineering report so as to better understand the defects, time-lines, the scope of work to remediate, the probability of ongoing costs, etc, so as to determine probability of higher than Market Special Assessments.  Conducted inspection. Informed shortly thereafter of the properties closing date-just 5 business days from our inspection date.
Continued requesting engineer report that buyer’s representative stated she could provide. 

On 3rd business day since inspection, Ms. K.N., loan production officer of XXXtrust Mortgage left multiple voice mail recordings announcing her displeasure with appraiser methodology. In one such message she stated her prominence as “Top Producer” with
XXXtrust Mortgage. She went on to threaten appraiser by pointing out prospective borrower, Mr. M.D., is related to an executive of BIG. She was prepared to send a “mass e-mail” to BIG if appraisal process continued to impede her time-line. 

Continued to receive multiple calls from every member of the buyer’s team: Ms. K.N., Ms. P., Mr. M.D., and the title representative. 

Numerous requests now made for engineering report including call to engineer.  On the 5th business day since inspection, appraiser received a recorded message from Mr. L.L., the engineer of record for the project.  On the morning of the 6th business day since inspection, appraiser conducted full telephone interview with both the engineer of record and a representative/member of the Condominium Owners Association, Ms. M.S..   

Appraiser learns of a 2.5 million dollars shortfall the condominium owners are responsible for. Amount was borrowed and must be paid back by the owners through Special Assessments.  Without a doubt, this is information of the type, when properly disclosed to potential buyers and Realtors, can create negative perception.  Property value diminution is highly probable. 

Several hours after updating BIG of these latest findings and progress, we learn
from BIG the assignment had been cancelled earlier in the morning at the request of Ms.K.N. of XXXtrust Mortgage.  Ms. K.N. states to Ms. P.P. of BIG that another appraiser was hired and completed appraisal report in less than 24 hours.

Ms. K.N.’s decision to supplant our report is without cause. We clearly communicated complexities, and due diligence requirements.  Every effort was made to complete a credible, reliable, and adequately researched appraisal report.  The independent, third party provision of the appraisal process is violated when a biased, loan production agent
can make the decision to supplant appraisers and appraisal reports when the direction of the appraisal is deemed not to favor a desired outcome.  Ms. K.N. violated appraiser pressure regulations by calling appraiser and making threats to harm appraiser’s reputation with BIG.

We urge a complete investigation.

Sincerely,

Gary Geraci
512-xxx-xxxx

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

5. Joe Appraiser (A Worldly Kind of Guy)


(Original Text,  "Joe Appraiser on Easy Street" Posted in 2007 by Gary E. Geraci)

Like most in this profession, to make any money as an appraiser I take a bulk of assignments from lenders.

My job is simple.  I write glowing appraisal reports so that loans get approved.  Period.  I don’t worry about doing detailed inspections of the property and I don’t like to photograph things that could lower the value of the property or raise red flags with the lender’s underwriting department; things like cracked slabs, mold, etc.   Reporting things like that kills deals.  I don’t do detailed write ups either. Why bother?  It takes extra time and my client’s look at one thing and one thing only: the final appraised value.  To them, everything else in the report is regulatory boilerplate, fluff.

I keep friends with lenders, loan officers, mortgage brokers, and real estate agents.  I network within their circles, eat and drink well; slap backs, trade stories, and exchange numbers.  I am a go-to guy, the guy on the team that won’t hold things up.  I want to keep my friends happy because they send me lots of business.  More than I can handle.  I write 10 reports a week by myself.  At $250-$350 a pop you do the numbers.  I’ve even molded a couple of apprentices in the office to do another 15 reports a week.  We are in the business of producing “deal winning” reports within 48 hours.  In the fiercely competitive world of lending, killing deals only makes clients unhappy and sends them to the competition. 

Loan underwriters like me because I take the burden of risk off of their backs.  If a family needs money I am not going to write something up that kills their refinance deal.  On paper, any property can be made to look more valuable than it really is.  It doesn’t matter to me that the family might not make enough money to make the new mortgage payments.  At times, clients provide me recently sold, supportive “comparable” property information for use in my report.  I use these in my report to create value because its quick and it supports the value that my client needs to make the deal happen.   Should a deal go bad later, it’s not their back and very unlikely to be mine either.    

Real estate investors like me because I can salvage their deals.  Many “flippers” have gone over budget or have over improved a place beyond what the market is now willing to pay for the place.   Any naïve soul trying to buy the place at a price well above market value usually needs a bank loan to complete the purchase and that’s where I come in.  I’ll produce a reported property value that seals the bank deal.

Face it, today, an appraisal report is a commodity product, a quickly produced report that hits a predetermined collateral value and minimizes any property deficiencies.  The industry simply contracts out for this now, gets exactly what it wants, and yet still covers its own back in the process.  Most mortgage loans it takes in will be packaged into a security offering, moved out of the institution, and sold to the government and increasingly, private sector investors.  With the new influx of capital, the process repeats over and over again.

What’s the harm?  Technically and legally my value is just an “opinion” of value anyway.  If I don’t give a client exactly what he wants, all of the time, he simply finds another appraiser who will.  I don’t have a crystal ball but I know how the real estate business works.  In a few years the property will have appreciated, whether artificially or not, to a value high enough to cover my inflated value.  I don’t lose any sleep over these deals.


“We must always take sides.  Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.  Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ---Elie Wiesel

Friday, April 20, 2012

4. Dig

(Original Text Posted in 2007 by Gary E. Geraci)
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I am rearranging 
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I was slowly changing
JANUARY 2006: AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, THE LARGEST PRIVATELY HELD RETAIL MORTGAGE LENDER & LARGEST SUBPRIME LENDER BY VOLUME IN AMERICA IS SETTLING WITH 49 STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OVER ALLEGATIONS OF UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE LENDING PRACTICES. 
I would love to beat the face,
Of any mother @#%&!! that's thinkin' they can change me,
White knuckles grip pushing through for the gold,
If you're wantin' a piece of me I broke the mother @#%&! mold,
I'm drowning in your wake
%$#@ rubbed in my face
Teething on concrete
Gums bleeding
AMERIQUEST WILL PAY $295 MILLION TO CONSUMERS IN RESTITUTION.
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I am rearranging
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I was slowly changing
THE STATES ALLEGED THAT AMERIQUEST FRAUDENTLY INFLATED APPRAISALS, FABRICATED BORROWER INCOME, MISREPRESENTED LOAN TERMS, USED HIGH PRESSURE SALES TACTICS, PROVIDED UNTIMELY FUNDING, PROVIDED DISPARAGING DISCLOSURES
I struggle in violated space,
Sell out mother@#%&! in the biz that try to %$#@ me,
Hang from their T's rated P.G. insight,
I ain't sellin' my soul when there's nothing to buy
I'm livid in my space
@#%&!! in my face
%$#@ you
While you try
To %$#@ me
SIGNIFICANT INJUNCTIVE PROVISIONS-AMERIQUEST IS REQUIRED TO: SUBSTANTIALLY REVISE ITS COMPENSATION SYSTEM TO ELIMINATE INCENTIVES FOR EMPLOYEES TO DECEIVE BORROWERS, OVERHAUL THE COMPANY’S APPRAISAL PRACTICES BY REMOVING BRANCH OFFICES AND SALES PERSONNEL FROM THE APPRAISER SELECTION PROCESS, PROHIBITING THEM FROM PRESSURING APPRAISERS FOR HIGHER VALUES AND INSTITUTING A SYSTEM OF PERIODIC REVIEW TO ENSURE THE INDEPENDENCE OF APPRAISERS AND THE ACCURACY AND INTEGRITY OF THE APPRAISALS, ADOPT POLICIES TO PROTECT WHISTLE-BLOWERS AND FACILITATE REPORTING OF IMPROPER CONDUCT
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I am rearranging
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I was you ain't @#%&!! changing me
dig
dig
dig
dig, kill, now mother@#%&!!
dig, kill, now mother@#%&!!
dig, kill, now mother@#%&!!
dig,
kill.
THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION HAS WATCHED THE SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS CAREFULLY BECAUSE BILLIONAIRE ROLAND E. ARNALL, AMERIQUEST’S FOUNDER AND PRINCIPAL SHEREHOLDER IS PRESIDENT BUSH’S NOMINEE TO BE AMBASSADOR TO THE NETHERLANDS.  ARNALL HAS BEEN BUSH’S SINGLE LARGEST CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTOR SINCE 2002. www.washingtonpost.com
Let me help you tie the rope around your neck,
Let me help to talk you the wrong way off the ledge,
Let me help you hold the glock against your head
Let me help you tie the rope around your neck,
Let me help to talk you the wrong way off the ledge,
Let me help you hold the glock against your head,
Let me help to chain the weights onto your legs
Get on the plank @#%&!
“WHAT WE’VE SEEN IN HUMAN TERMS IS CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE FOR SOME INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE MISLED OR DICEIVED OR WHO RECEIVED LOANS GREATER THAN THEY COULD POSSIBLY AFFORD BECAUSE OF INFLATED INCOME LEVELS OR APPRAISALS RESULTING FROM EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT.  THE ABUSES ARE SYSTEMIC IN NUMBER AND NATURE” CONNETICUT ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARD BLUMENTHAL.
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I am rearranging
Dig bury me underneath
Everything that I was slowly changing
Wish you were committing
Suicide suckin' on a mother@#%&! tailpipe
Dead man walking on a tight rope
Limbless in the middle of a channel bomb's away
UNLESS INDICATED, DATA FACTS EXCERPTED FROM WASHINGTON STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S WEBSITE WHERE THE STATE’S FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOHN MCKAY WAS EMPLOYED UNTIL HIS UNEXPECTED FIRING IN DECEMBER, 2006 DURING A CONTROVERSIAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SHAKEUP.

Thanks to mark-hi@hotmail.com for submitting the lyrics. The DIG LYRICS are the property of the respective authors, artists and labels, the lyrics are provided for educational purposes only , If you like the song, please buy relative CD to support Mudvayne.  Copyright © 2000-2007 sing365.com

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

3. I Wont Do What You Tell Me!

 (Original Text Posted in 2007 by Gary E. Geraci, hyperlinks added this posting - Actual names and addresses redacted by author, April 2012, however all dates and case numbers are authentic and can be retrieved under Federal Open Records law.)

“%@!# You! I Wont Do What You Tell Me!” -Killing in the Name by Rage Against the Machine 

“On 8/20/2004, Ms. N. B., the assignment's Houston, TX loan production officer of MORTGAGE BANK WF calls appraiser and demands that the cost to cure addenda be removed from the appraisal.  Appraiser states that this may not be possible. Ms. B. begins to attack appraiser’s qualifications with appraiser.  Ms. B. threatens to contact appraiser’s appraisal management company, AMC V.  Appraiser ends call as Ms. B.'s personal attacks are not welcome.” 
  • excerpt from August 25, 2004 complaint letter to the Comptroller of the Currency: OCC Case 510551: 
    • Undue lender pressure from MORTGAGE BANK WF loan officer and
    • MORTGAGE BANK WF's appraiser management company, AMC V 
    • to affect appraisal outcome on property located at 11111 Any Road, Leander, TX 78641 
“As stated in the report, during the inspection the appraiser noted multiple items of work in progress namely, electrical work in progress, septic tank work in  progress, plumbing work in progress.  In addition, electrical safety hazards, fire hazards, security hazards, and conditions for termite infestation and lead based paint hazards were observed. Multiple occurrences of curable functional obsolescence were documented and the associated costs to cure quantified according to the intended user’s scope of work request and standard USPAP practice.  Without a doubt, these items, if revealed to a market participant, would affect value or financing concessions.  After the inspection, the appraiser was made aware of “Addendum to Inspection No. 6233” in which the content of the Addendum further supported and continues to support the appraiser’s original observations…. Therefore, we hold that the “Appraiser’s Estimate of Cost to Cure Worksheet” is valid as delivered and no changes will be made.-Gary Geraci”

  • - excerpt from Gary Geraci’s appraisal report of property located at 11111 Any Road, Leander, TX 78641, 
  • AMC V Tracking No.11038845


Sunday, April 15, 2012

2. The Credibility of Rage

(Original Text Posted in 2007 by Gary E. Geraci)
“rage n 1: violent anger” - Webster’s Vest Pocket Dictionary

“Leontius, the son of Aglaion, coming up one day from the Piraeus, under the north wall on the outside, observed some dead bodies lying on the ground at the place of execution. He felt a desire to see them, and also a dread and abhorrence of them; for a time he struggled and covered his eyes, but at length the desire got the better of him; and forcing them open, he ran up to the dead bodies, saying, Look, ye wretches, take your fill of the fair sight.

The moral of the tale is that anger at times goes to war with desire, as though they were two distinct things.  When a man's desires violently prevail over his reason, he reviles himself, and is angry at the violence within him, and that in this struggle his spirit is on the side of his reason.

…passion or spirit when not corrupted by bad education is the natural auxiliary of reason.”  The Republic, Book IV, by Plato

Rage isn’t respectful and is often hushed in schoolrooms, courtrooms and boardrooms alike.  Thank God for “creative license” and the many alternative avenues of free expression like song lyrics, books, poetry, and yes, blogs.  Has not rage of reason inspired resurgence against the unjust? Has not rage of reason resurrected justice?

Injustice is repugnant and so be it the rage borne by it. Such rage aims not to revere. 

Rage borne of indignation is virtuous.

Rage borne of reason is credible.

1. But I Don't Believe

It doesn't matter, God believes in you.

Here I give you what is called personal testimony.   The blog, The Beat Goes On, is personal testimony.  At its worst it is painful, arrogant and self seeking, I agree, but still, I am convinced at its best, the confessions taken together reveal something transcendental, something greater than me, something I am convinced is at work in your life too whether you believe in God or not. 

A few weeks ago I released a posting titled "The Biggest Civil Project" originally written and posted during June 2007.  For me, this period marked what I can only call a pronounced turning point in my life.  The beginning of a tangible  pouring out of God's infinite mercy and grace guiding my own life in a completely new direction.

The following original blog postings are from a dark period immediately prior to this new turn in direction.  During the height of the mortgage and banking industry's fleecing of America, I, an independent "by the book" real estate appraiser, had become the victim of an alleged blacklisting campaign which ended up costing me my appraisal career, first marriage, home, property, and livelihood.  In other words, I had lost nearly everything. 

I hope to demonstrate to you that we are all God's instruments for positive change even when we do not perceive it or necessarily will it.   First, through my own life's confessions, I hope to continue to reveal God's work in progress so that you may see evidence of Him and learn to see Him in your own life too.  Second, I want to inspire you to action when critical events in your life begin to challenge your conscience, knowing God will be on your side too.  Finally, I hope you can tell your own story one day perhaps following the same formula used here: 

 I was on this path, until the Holy Spirit acted in my life, and now, dying to my old self, (an ongoing, never ending process by the way), I am on a new path laid out by Jesus Christ our Savior and Lord.

I will number the entries, beginning with this post, to make them easier to follow and in the order originally written.  The material will be posted unedited and as is except I have opted to replace original use of profanity with symbolic references in respect of my readers.  

So today, on Devine Mercy Sunday 2012, I offer these confessions as my personal "apostolate" or contribution to the Church's call for New Evangelization.   God indeed is merciful.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

The Biggest Civil Project

(Original Text Posted June 2007 by Gary E. Geraci)
The biggest civil project that I’ll ever build…

In the modest role as the carpenter’s apprentice, I completed construction on a monumental, Austin “civil” project today.  No, this project has nothing to do with wastewater, water treatment, or highway transportation corridors or is anything like any other privately or publicly financed civil project that I studied during formal engineering school or permitted during my brief stint as a government employee. 



Today, I proudly completed construction on a structure sure to serve the civil masses of Austinites and visitors for years to come…. a rather unassuming, single level cedar faced deck structure abutting the old converted gas station located on the northwest corner of Lamar and Barton Springs Road now owned and operated by the Barton Springs Saloon.  

It just so happens that this famous Austin intersection gets a ton of daily traffic, one of the highest counts in the city according to local store owners.  So I am immensely satisfied in forecasting diverse people of all kinds and social status gathering here to unwind, relax, and socialize -many on top of this very structure, to later leave served, renewed, refreshed, and, well yeah, maybe a little drunk too.   

A tangible product that is honest and full of potential; resulting from a combination of creativity, management, capital, materials, and labor is just like any other civil project of the day.   

What a joy it is to see a couple of patrons already relaxing on the fresh cedar planks placed just moments ago.
Getting Back Up 2007-2009
 Now working as a carpenter's apprentice and living in a tent camper after divorce and a failed, year long court battle with the banking industry sent me into hard times. Gary Geraci, June, 2007 

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Greater Kindness

Between 2001 through 2007, during my own "calls to action"  if you had asked me about God, I would have told you that I considered myself agnostic  and that "mankind cannot know God."   None-the-less, I still tried to love everyone even if we didn't always see eye-to-eye regarding say religious matters.  

Despite my unbelief, the older I became the more I developed this desire to do the right thing and to protect the little guy.   Where was this coming from?

Peter Kreeft in The Pocket Guide to The Meaning of Life writes "How has God revealed Himself?" In at least seven ways, I'll quote three of them here:

1.)  In nature, His creation, as an artist revealed in his art.
2.) In human nature, especially in conscience, His inner prophet in your soul.
3.) In every truth we discover, every good we do, and every beauty we create.

I can't explain exactly how this happens except from what I know today:  In ways we don't understand God chooses to work through us.




"If an employee learns that her company is polluting the environment or engaging in criminal fraud, she should report the offense to the appropriate authorities.  Decent people understandably balk at causing someone pain, financial difficulty, embarrassment or worse, public disgrace and imprisonment.  Their first reaction is that doing so would be unkind. 

The problem with this thinking is that it is too narrowly focused.

To report a harasser, burglar, or child molester is, in a sense, unkind to him but wonderfully kind to all his victims.  Conversely, not reporting the victimizer would be kind to him but unkind to the others.  The choice in such cases is between two kindnesses, and the decision should be for the greater kindness. -It could, of course, be argued that reporting a wrongdoer represents a kindness even to him.  It halts the wrongdoing and helps him redirect his life."  

Excerpt from: The Practice of Loving Kindness: A Guide to Spiritual Fulfillment and Social Harmony by Vincent Ryan Ruggiero (page 60)

For the Greater Public Interest - 2001

It was early September 2001, just prior to 9/11, two armed security guards escorted me out of my work area the day after my submission of the following, word for word statement to my employer’s purported "unbiased" Public Interest Council.  The incarnation of my antipathy towards public and governmental corruption was born here.

Statement to the Office of Public Interest Council

RE: Public Meeting Notice for Lake Travis II Investments - Permit No. 14257-001, Canyon at Lake Travis Wastewater Treatment Facilities

The Texas Water Code prescribes the duties of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission) relating to the control of pollution including the review and approval of plans and specifications for sewage disposal systems. This authority is found in Texas Water Code, §§5.013, 12.081-12.083, 15.104, 15.114, 26.023, 26.034, 49.181-49.182, 54.024, and 51.333.

In the course of it's duties, the commission recently conducted full plan and specification review on aerobic treatment systems using recirculating media filters, dosing tanks, and subsurface drip irrigation with shallow installation of drip tubing. The facility reviewed, Permit No.14227-001 (WWPR 0701/055) is similar in design and location to the facility proposed for the Canyon at Lake Travis Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Permit No. 14257-001 and was designed by the same consulting firm, Loomis-Austin.

The commission finds:

1.) The likelihood for effluent surfacing from some emitters at "shallow installations of 6 inches" is high
2.) Effluent surfacing from the installed drip tubing does not receive the additional treatment from the soil as designed
3.) Soil moisture sensors may not be helpful in preventing surfacing because the entire soil does not need to be saturated for surfacing to occur

When public access is expected in areas where effluent exposure is high, the commission historically rules citing Texas Administrative Code §309.3(g)(4):

"Except as provided herein, disinfection of domestic wastewater which is discharged by means of land disposal or evaporation pond shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to determine the need for disinfection. All effluent discharge to land which the public has access must be disinfected and if the effluent is to be transferred to a holding pond or tank, the effluent shall be rechlorinated to a trace chlorine residual at the point of irrigation application." [Emphasis added]

We understand that the Office of Public Interest Counsel's participation ensures that all relevant evidence on environmental, public, or consumer-related issues is developed and made part of the record for the commission's consideration of permit issuance. As a result, the commission is able to make better-informed decisions and issue permits that are protective of human health and the environment and take into account the greater public interest, as well as the interests of affected parties.

For comments or questions, please contact Gary E. Geraci, E.I.T. at (512) 239-5703.

Sincerely,

Gary E. Geraci, E.I.T.
Wastewater Plan and Specification Review Team (MC 148)
Water Permits & Resource Management Division